We would like to cultivate a culture of discussion

...with our agriconBLOG

agriconBLOG

18.04.2018 - Bodo Hanns (Send email to Bodo Hanns)

Do we really have to fertilize at maximum?

Do we really have to fertilize at maximum?

Since the amended Fertilizer Ordinance (DüV) became effective in summer 2017, farmers are obliged to determine a fertilizer requirement value N for all relevant arable crops and grassland. This is also the maximum permissible N fertilization level.

A major point of criticism of this regulation is that it is largely the same for all farms in Germany, irrespective of location, soil properties and annual weather conditions. In case of doubt, the maximum permissible N fertilization amounts on loamy sand hardly differ from the amounts on a loamy soil site.

With regard to the Fertilizer Ordinance, farmers face the challenge of achieving the best economic result on their farms as a businessman. In plant cultivation, optimum yields must be achieved with simultaneous high efficiency in the use of nutrients.

The owner of a mere fruit farm with short crop rotation may now think that the new regulations will not cause them any major problems. For yield management with mineral fertilizers is relatively easy to manage. However, this is too short-sighted, because in the medium term, soil fertility will suffer from this strategy. Therefore there is a need to take action on these farms.

On the other hand farms using organic materials (animal husbandry, biogas) must already pay attention to the avoidance of damage and to application quantities and dates if they want to achieve the optimum yield in terms of plant nutrition.

Regardless of the type of operation or cultivation, the industry is almost unanimous in its belief that capping the N quantities will have a more or less negative effect on yields. The reason for this is in the still widespread "accounting thinking": For a decitonne yield I need x kg N-fertilizer/ha.

However, this is not entirely correct, as the approach has two major flaws:

1. An expected yield is assumed for the N fertilization: this is usually the average of the farm. However, the exact yield of the current year is not known at the time of fertilization.

2. Total amount of N: this consists of the N fertilizer and the soil N. However, the proportion of nitrogen supplied from the soil cannot be determined on a flat-rate basis, but depends on various parameters which only become apparent in the course of the vegetation period.

The two essential components of the balance model and the determination of N fertilization are strictly speaking, two unknown variables.

What does this mean for fertilization? Depending on how the year, the location or the sub-area develops, these variables turn out very differently. The optimum fertilization level must also be correspondingly differentiated.

This can be illustrated very well using the example of the long-term yield trials of the Free State of Saxony (Fig. 1 on the next page).

Figure 1: Yield trials (nitrogen increase trials in small plot plants) from 1994 to 2013.

year base yield (dt/ha) optimal N-expense (kg/ha) optimum yield (dt/ha)
2013 43,5 216 80,4
2012 50,7 240 106,5
2011 65,7 205 113,6
2010 55,1 202 97,8
2009 54,4 203 102,6
2008 73,5 141 103,6
2007 75,8 166 104,3
2006 69,2 173 83,5

2005

55,8 213 105,5
2004 89 153 105,5
2003 45,9 158 65,2
2002 75,7 81 84,6
2001 64,7 191 87,4
2000 74,5 151 95,7
1999 59,9 159 86,3
1998 81,3 60 85
1997 48,9 194 83,2
1996 66,3 159 95,4
1995 71,4 115 83,4
1994 62,1 133 82,8
minimum 43 60 65
medium 64 166 93
maximum 89 240 113

Source: Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Dr. Albert

Three important pieces of information can be derived from these values:

  1. They illustrate how large the fluctuations in yield (optimum yield) can be between the years. The average yield of approx. 90 to 95 dt/ha is hardly affected, but much more often lower or higher yields are achieved.
  2. They clarify how much the optimum N fertilization level can vary between the years.
  3. In addition, the fluctuations in the basic yield show how big the influence of the factors weather, soil and soil N on the yield is.

Considering this intel we can make the following statement: There is no fixed relationship between the yield and the optimum amount of N fertilizer required for it! A yield of 80 to 85 dt/ha can or must be produced with 80 kg N/ha or 150 kg N/ha or also 200 kg N/ha optimum fertilizer.

Therefore, no serious statement can be made as to whether the fertilizer requirement of a fruit species will be limiting this year.

Once again for clarification:

If you take the tests from Saxony as a basis and compare these with a standard fertilizer requirement value according to DüV of 183 kg N fertilizer/ha (WW A 230 kg / yield average 93dt/ha +13 kg / Nmin -50 kg/ha / previous crop effect -10 kg), the following result is theoretically obtained:

  • Fertilizer requirement value: 183 kg N fertilizer /ha
  • Fertilizer requirement value for achieving optimum yield exceeded: 8 out of 20 years
  • Fertilizer requirement value for achieving the optimum yield undershot: 12 out of 20 years

However, these facts can be countered with a flexible and variable N fertilization. With the Agricon N fertilization method, the resource nitrogen can be used highly efficiently in time, quantity and location. With our digital solutions, every farmer can - also under the conditions of the amended Fertilizer Ordinance - operate in an economically and ecologically optimal manner and ensure the future viability of his farm.

Further information on the Agricon N fertilization process: www.agricon.de/n-duengung

This project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 720176.

Downloads

pdf | 109 KB

Write the first comment on this article

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.

Back to listview

Please select your language

We have noticed that you are visiting the website with a different language. Please select your preferred language.